KodakTri-X 400
Contrasty black and white with deep blacks and visible grain
- Manufacturer
- Eastman Kodak
- ISO
- 400
- Type
- Black and white
- Process
- B&W
- Formats
- 135, 120
- Status
- In production
- Datasheet
- F-4017
- Preset
- GA — 003 / P
Status checked [3]
Character
- Contrast
- Bold, per reviews; Kodak's development times target a contrast index of 0.56
- Grain
- Diffuse RMS granularity 17 (datasheet)
- Latitude
- One stop under at normal development; push to EI 1600 or 3200
- Best for
- Dim light, fast action, depth of field (Kodak)
Kodak Tri-X 400 is a high-speed panchromatic black-and-white negative film, developed in standard black-and-white chemistry such as D-76, HC-110 or XTOL [1]. It has been sold since around 1940 and was re-engineered in 2007 under the code 400TX [6]. It kept its name when Eastman Kodak took over its distribution in January 2026 [4] [5].
Look and color
Tri-X turns colors into grays according to its own spectral sensitivity, not the eye’s:
- Blue renders light. The film is more sensitive to violet and blue than the eye [1], so blue skies come out pale without a filter. Analogue Wonderland also notes that blues render “the lightest” [8].
- Skin and reds render a little darker. Converting our test RAW files with the Tri-X curve instead of plain luminance made a sky 3.2 L* lighter, skin 3.8 L* darker and a pink shirt 1.2 L* darker [13].
- Filters. To darken skies, Kodak gives daylight filter factors of 2 for a No. 8 yellow, 2.5 for a No. 15 deep yellow and 8 for a No. 25 red [1].
- Reviews describe “bold contrast, rich tones” [9], “deep, obsidian blacks and crisp contrast” [8] and a “ready-to-publish contrast” that needs little editing [7].
Tonality
- Curve. On the datasheet’s characteristic curves, base plus fog sits near 0.3 density. The toe is long and gradual (about one log unit), the straight section long, and there is almost no shoulder: highlights keep separating (our reading of the graph) [1].
- Development sets the contrast. Kodak’s starting-point times target a contrast index of 0.56, and the datasheet plots contrast index against development time for seven developers [1]. The same film can look flatter or harder depending on the developer and time.
- Compared with other 400s. In one side-by-side test, Tri-X rendered a gray backdrop darker with a wider tonal range, while HP5 Plus and T-Max 400 came out flatter [10].
- Latitude. Kodak lists “wide exposure latitude” [1]:
- one stop of underexposure with normal development gives a slight loss of shadow detail;
- two stops (EI 1600) or three stops (EI 3200) need push development, with more contrast and grain and less shadow detail.
- Long exposures: no correction from 1/100 to 1/10 s. From 1 s, add 1 to 3 stops and shorten development by 10 to 30 % [1].
Grain and sharpness
| Film | Diffuse RMS granularity | Developer |
|---|---|---|
| Kodak Tri-X 400 | 17 [1] | HC-110 (B) |
| Kodak Tri-X 320 | 16 [1] | HC-110 (B) |
| Kodak T-Max 400 | 10 [11] | D-76 |
| Ilford HP5 Plus | not published [12] | – |
- Kodak calls an RMS of 17 “fine” [1]. RMS values measured in different developers are only roughly comparable.
- Reviews: “relatively fine-grained for ISO 400”, with grain showing when zooming into 35 mm scans [7]; “distinctive grain” [9]; grain becomes “pronounced” when pushed [8].
- Sharpness: Kodak lists “high sharpness” and “high resolving power” but gives no lines-per-millimeter figure, only a modulation transfer curve [1].
Spectral sensitivity
On an equal-energy basis, sensitivity is highest in the violet and blue (around 360 to 400 nm), dips near 505 nm, rises again to a broad maximum around 575 nm with a small peak near 620 nm, then falls steeply past 625 nm to the bottom of the chart near 668 nm [1]. In practice, blue skies turn lighter and skin and reds darker than in a luminance conversion [13]. Kodak’s 2007 edition notes that this curve was measured on the older Tri-X Pan 5063 emulsion and is expected to apply to the new one [2].
Datasheet digest
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISO speed | 400 | [3] |
| Diffuse RMS granularity | 17, rated 'fine' by Kodak (HC-110 dilution B, 20 °C; net density 1.0, 48 µm aperture, 12×) | [1] |
| Target contrast index | 0.56 (starting-point development times) | [1] |
| Characteristic curve | Long, gradual toe, long straight section, almost no shoulder (read from the graph) | [1] |
| Underexposure | 1 stop at normal development (slight loss of shadow detail) | [1] |
| Push processing | Development times published for EI 1600 (2 stops) and EI 3200 (3 stops) | [1] |
| Reciprocity | No correction from 1/100 to 1/10 s; +1 stop at 1 s, +2 at 10 s, +3 at 100 s, with shorter development | [1] |
| D-76 stock, small tank, 20 °C | 6¾ min | [1] |
| Filter factors, daylight | No. 8 yellow ×2, No. 15 deep yellow ×2.5, No. 25 red ×8, No. 58 green ×6 | [1] |
| Resolving power | Not given (Kodak: 'high resolving power'); MTF curve published | [1] |
Names, status and history
- 1940 and 1954. Tri-X was introduced around 1940 in sheets, rated ASA 200 in daylight and 160 in tungsten, and released in 35 mm and 120 in 1954 [6] [7].
- 2007: 400TX. Kodak moved black-and-white production to a new coating facility and warned of slightly different processing times [2]. The film was re-engineered, took the code 400TX instead of TX or TX400, became finer-grained and uses less silver [6].
- Tri-X 320 is a different film. The 2021 datasheet lists Tri-X 320 (320TXP) in sheets only, with its own curves and an RMS of 16 [1].
- 2026: Eastman Kodak. Since January 2026, Eastman Kodak distributes Tri-X 400 directly, in new packaging, instead of Kodak Alaris [4]. Unlike Portra and T-Max, it kept its name [5]. On September 29, 2026, Kodak’s site listed 135-24, 135-36, 35 mm × 100 ft and 120 [3]. The datasheet also mentions a Tri-X 400 single-use camera [1].
- Datasheet. The most recent datasheet we found is F-4017 from October 2021, published by Kodak Alaris [1].
Alternatives
- GA — 001 Ilford HP5 Plus
The other classic ISO 400: flatter than Tri-X and with more shadow detail in a side-by-side test
- GA — 019 Kodak T-Max 400
Kodak's T-grain 400, now also sold as Ektapan 400: much finer grain on paper (RMS 10 in D-76, against 17 in HC-110)
- GA — 082 Kodak Tri-X 320
Its sheet-film sister (320TXP), RMS 16, which Kodak pitches for tone gradation and brilliant highlights under controlled light
Get the look in darktable
The GA — 003 / P preset, inspired by Kodak Tri-X 400, is a darktable 5.6 style of 4 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.
| Zone | Metric | Before → after |
|---|---|---|
| sky | L (channel weights only) | 55.2 → 58.4 |
| skin | L (channel weights only) | 79.3 → 75.5 |
| pink T-shirt | L (channel weights only) | 47.8 → 46.6 |
Settings, all measurements and limits of the Kodak Tri-X 400 preset
See real photos
Scans of real Kodak Tri-X 400 film, published by others:
- The Darkroom: Tri-X 400 film reviews and customer photos thedarkroom.com
- Analog.cafe: Kodak Tri-X 400 film review, with sample scans analog.cafe
- Analogue Wonderland: Everything you need to know about Kodak Tri-X analoguewonderland.co.uk
Questions about Kodak Tri-X 400
Is Tri-X film still made?
Yes. Tri-X 400 is in production and, since January 2026, distributed directly by Eastman Kodak under the same name. On September 29, 2026, Kodak's site listed it in 35 mm (24 and 36 exposures, 100 ft bulk rolls) and 120. Tri-X 320, sold in sheets, is a separate film with its own datasheet figures.
Is Kodak Tri-X C-41?
No. Tri-X is a traditional black-and-white negative film. Kodak's datasheet gives development times only for black-and-white developers, such as D-76, HC-110, XTOL and T-MAX, so it needs a lab or a home setup that develops black-and-white film, not a C-41 color line.
Can you push Tri-X 400 to 1600?
Yes. Kodak publishes development times for EI 1600 (two stops) and EI 3200 (three stops) in D-76, XTOL, T-MAX and other developers, and warns of more contrast and grain and less shadow detail. At EI 800, Kodak says normal development still gives acceptable prints, with a slight loss of shadow detail.
When was Kodak Tri-X released?
Tri-X appeared around 1940 as a sheet film rated ASA 200 in daylight, and came to 35 mm and 120 rolls in 1954. Kodak re-engineered it in 2007, when it moved to a new coating plant and became 400TX, with finer grain. The current datasheet, F-4017, dates from October 2021.
Tri-X 400 or HP5 Plus?
Both are classic ISO 400 black-and-white films. In a side-by-side test, Tri-X gave more contrast and a wider tonal range, while HP5 Plus kept more shadow detail. Kodak publishes an RMS granularity of 17 for Tri-X; Ilford publishes no RMS figure for HP5 Plus, so their grain cannot be compared on paper.
Sources
- 1DS Kodak Professional Tri-X 320 and 400, technical data F-4017 (October 2021)
- 2DS Kodak Professional Tri-X 320 and 400, technical data F-4017 (May 2007), copy hosted by 125px
- 3M Eastman Kodak: Tri-X 400 film, product page Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 4C PetaPixel: Ektar and Tri-X are now being distributed directly by Kodak (Matt Growcoot, January 21, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 5C Kosmo Foto: Eastman Kodak is distributing all its films again. What happens next? (Stephen Dowling, April 21, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 6C Wikipedia: Kodak Tri-X Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 7C Analog.cafe: Kodak Tri-X 400 film review (updated December 17, 2025) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 8C Analogue Wonderland: Everything you need to know about Kodak Tri-X (Karen Freer, updated February 9, 2024) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 9C The Darkroom: Tri-X 400 film reviews and photos Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 10C Shoot It With Film: Kodak Tri-X, Ilford HP5 and Kodak T-Max comparisons (Amy Elizabeth, January 31, 2020) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 11DS Kodak Professional T-Max 400, technical data F-4043 (February 2016)
- 12DS Ilford HP5 Plus, technical information (November 2018)
- 13B The Grain Archive: Kodak Tri-X 400 style, validation measurements
DS: datasheet · M: manufacturer · C: review or community · B: Grain Archive measurement