KodakPortra 400
Warm and natural; reviews call the saturation restrained
- Manufacturer
- Eastman Kodak
- ISO
- 400
- Type
- Color negative
- Process
- C-41
- Formats
- 135, 120, 4x5, 8x10
- Status
- In production
- Datasheet
- E-4050
- Preset
- GA — 004 / P
Character
- Contrast
- Low to medium
- Grain
- Print Grain Index 37 (35 mm, 4×6 print)
- Latitude
- About −1 to +3 stops in published tests
- Best for
- Portraits, fashion, travel and outdoor work (Kodak)
Kodak Portra 400 is an ISO 400 color negative film for C-41 processing. Kodak recommends it for portrait, fashion, travel and outdoor photography, and it is known for its skin tones and its tolerance of overexposure [1] [7]. Since March 2026, Eastman Kodak also sells a film called Ektacolor Pro 400, which the photo press describes as the same Portra 400 under a new name; Kodak Alaris still sells the Portra-branded boxes [2] [4] [6].
Look and color
- Saturation: the manufacturer and the reviews disagree. Kodak’s datasheet promises “exceptional color saturation” [1]. Reviews describe something more reserved: “fairly subdued in both contrast and saturation” next to Ektar 100 or slide film [15], colors “bold, yet reserved” [8], and less saturated than UltraMax 400 in a lab’s side-by-side test [10].
- Warm overall. Reviews speak of a “warm, natural color palette” [7] and a rendering “on the warmer side” [8]. Next to UltraMax 400, Portra showed a slightly warmer white balance [10].
- Skin tones are the film’s reputation: Kodak markets “spectacular skin tones” [1], and reviews agree [7] [8]. One reviewer notes a slight bias toward magenta in skin [15].
- Shadows lean blue or blue-green. Analog.cafe warns that shadows “may appear slightly blue” [9]. In a lab comparison, Portra’s shadows were “very blue/green” next to UltraMax 400 [10].
- The scanner changes the look. A Fuji Frontier scan tends toward more vivid color and golden skin, a Noritsu scan toward softer, lighter color and peach or pink skin [14]. On Noritsu scans, one reviewer found Portra 400 cooler and less saturated than CineStill 400D [13]. “Warm” is therefore partly a lab choice.
Tonality
- Curve. On the datasheet’s characteristic curves, the three layers run almost parallel, with a short toe and no visible shoulder up to about 6 stops above middle gray. The slope reads at roughly 0.55 to 0.7 (our reading of the graph) [1].
- Contrast is described as “medium” [7] or “subdued” [15].
- Latitude is lopsided. Overexposure is well tolerated, underexposure much less:
- Dehancer’s test found acceptable color from −1 to +3 EV, with lost shadow detail and reddish highlights below −1 EV [11].
- Kyle McDougall was comfortable with anything from 1 to 3 stops over, and judged −1 stop the worst he could accept [12].
- Casual Photophile got usable images at four stops over, and finds some of the film’s “prettiest shots” overexposed [8]. Analog.cafe suggests metering at ISO 100 with normal development [9].
- Long exposures: Kodak requires no filter or exposure correction from 1/10,000 s to 1 s [1].
Grain and sharpness
Kodak rates grain with the Print Grain Index (PGI), a perceptual scale for prints viewed at 14 inches. 25 is the approximate visibility threshold, and 4 units make one just-noticeable difference. It cannot be compared with RMS granularity [1].
| Film (35 mm negative, 4×6 print) | Print Grain Index |
|---|---|
| Kodak Portra 160 | 28 [17] |
| Kodak Portra 400 | 37 [1] |
| Kodak UltraMax 400 | 46 [19] |
| Kodak Portra 800 | 48 [18] |
- Enlargement drives it: 59 at 8×10 and 89 at 16×20 from 35 mm, but 25 for a 4×6 from a 120 negative [1].
- Reviews: finer than Kodak Gold 200 but “still noticeable, particularly in 35mm film scans” [9]; hard to spot in 4×6 prints for Casual Photophile [8], although the datasheet places that print above the threshold.
- Sharpness: Kodak publishes modulation transfer curves but no resolving power figure [1].
Spectral sensitivity
The blue-sensitive layer stays on a plateau from about 400 to 475 nm, the green-sensitive layer peaks at 550 nm and the red-sensitive layer near 650 nm. The blue and green curves cross near 488 nm, green and red near 586 nm [1]. The Grain Archive color style is tuned from the datasheet and the reviews above; it is not computed from these curves.
Datasheet digest
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISO speed | 400 in daylight; 100 under 3200 K tungsten with an 80A filter; 125 under 3400 K photolamps with an 80B filter | [1] |
| Print Grain Index, 35 mm | 37 (4×6), 59 (8×10), 89 (16×20) | [1] |
| Print Grain Index, 120 (6×6) | 25 (4×6), 37 (8×10), 59 (16×20) | [1] |
| Print Grain Index, 4×5 sheet | Under 25 (4×6 and 8×10), 36 (16×20) | [1] |
| Grain visibility threshold | PGI 25; 4 units = one just-noticeable difference | [1] |
| Characteristic curve | Short toe, no visible shoulder up to about 6 stops above middle gray (read from the graph) | [1] |
| Reciprocity | No correction from 1/10,000 s to 1 s | [1] |
| Resolving power | Not given; MTF curves published | [1] |
| Base | 0.10 mm Estar thick base (135, 120); 0.19 mm (sheets) | [1] |
| Process | C-41 (Kodak Flexicolor chemicals) | [1] |
Names, status and history
- 1998 and 2010. The Portra family dates from 1998. The current Portra 400 replaced the 400NC and 400VC versions in late 2010, using technology from Kodak’s Vision motion picture films [16]. The datasheet still lists “Kodak Vision film technology” and T-Grain emulsions [1].
- Two Kodaks. Eastman Kodak had handed the distribution of its still films to Kodak Alaris since 2012, and Kodak Alaris owns the Portra name [5].
- Ektacolor Pro 400 (March 2026). On March 24, 2026, Eastman Kodak launched Ektacolor Pro 160, 400 and 800 [4].
- Kodak’s product page describes Ektacolor Pro 400 as “the world’s sharpest and finest grain 400 speed color negative film” but does not mention Portra [3].
- PetaPixel writes that the films “appear to be” the Portra line, with the same speeds, formats and claims [4]. Digital Camera World, citing a Los Angeles lab, says the emulsions stay the same [6].
- We found no official Kodak statement that the two are identical: treat it as reported, not confirmed.
- Both names on sale. On September 29, 2026, Kodak Alaris still listed Portra 400 in 135, 120 and sheet sizes up to 20×24 [2], and Kosmo Foto reported that Alaris keeps distributing its films [5]. Ektacolor Pro 400 is listed in 135, 120, 4×5 and 8×10 [3].
Alternatives
- GA — 005 Kodak Portra 160
Same family at ISO 160, with finer grain: PGI 28 against 37 for a 4×6 print from 35 mm
- GA — 006 Kodak Portra 800
One stop faster for low light, at the cost of more grain: PGI 48 against 37
- GA — 009 Kodak UltraMax 400
Same speed, consumer film: more saturated and grainier (PGI 46) in a lab side-by-side, and pitched as the budget choice
- GA — 007 Kodak Ektar 100
Kodak's other professional negative, sold on 'high saturation and ultra-vivid color', with grain below the visibility threshold at 4×6
Get the look in darktable
The GA — 004 / P preset, inspired by Kodak Portra 400, is a darktable 5.6 style of 4 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.
| Zone | Metric | Before → after |
|---|---|---|
| sky | C (chroma) | 27.5 → 22.4 |
| sea | C (chroma) | 22.2 → 18.4 |
| skin | C (chroma) | 16.4 → 17.4 |
Settings, all measurements and limits of the Kodak Portra 400 preset
GA — 004 / P · darktable preset
Portra 400
for darktable
See real photos
Scans of real Kodak Portra 400 film, published by others:
- The Darkroom: Portra 400 / Ektacolor Pro 400 reviews and customer photos thedarkroom.com
- Analog.cafe: Kodak Ektacolor Pro 400 film review, with sample scans analog.cafe
- Casual Photophile: Film profile, Kodak Portra 400 casualphotophile.com
Questions about Kodak Portra 400
Is Ektacolor Pro 400 the same as Portra 400?
Reportedly, yes. Eastman Kodak launched Ektacolor Pro 400 in March 2026 with the same speed, formats and product description, and the photo press reports it as Portra 400 under a new name, because Kodak Alaris owns the Portra trademark. Kodak's own product page does not mention Portra, so this is not an official statement.
Is Portra 400 discontinued?
No. On September 29, 2026, Kodak Alaris still listed Kodak Professional Portra 400 in 135, 120 and sheet sizes, and Eastman Kodak was selling what the press describes as the same film under the name Ektacolor Pro 400. The name on the box depends on which Kodak company distributes it.
What is Portra 400 good for?
Kodak recommends it for portrait and fashion work, and for nature, travel and outdoor photography where the light cannot be controlled. Reviews single out its skin tones and its tolerance of overexposure: published tests found usable results up to three stops over, but only about one stop under.
What white balance is Portra 400?
Portra 400 is balanced for daylight and electronic flash, at ISO 400. Under 3200 K tungsten light, Kodak's datasheet recommends a Wratten 80A filter and ISO 100; under 3400 K photolamps, an 80B filter and ISO 125. Kodak gives these filters for best results without special correction at printing.
Is Portra 400 grainy?
Not much for an ISO 400 film, but the grain is there. Kodak rates a 4×6 print from 35 mm at a Print Grain Index of 37, above the visibility threshold of 25, and an 8×10 at 59. The same 4×6 print from 120 film scores 25. Reviews say the grain shows in 35 mm scans.
Sources
- 1DS Kodak Professional Portra 400, technical data E-4050 (January 2025)
- 2M Kodak Alaris: Kodak Professional Portra 400 film, product page Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 3M Eastman Kodak: Ektacolor Pro 400 film, product page Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 4C PetaPixel: Kodak's Ektacolor Pro film is the new name of the beloved Portra (Jeremy Gray, March 24, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 5C Kosmo Foto: Eastman Kodak is distributing all its films again. What happens next? (Stephen Dowling, April 21, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 6C Digital Camera World: Kodak's camera films have just changed names (James Artaius, May 27, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 7C The Darkroom: Kodak Portra 400 / Ektacolor Pro 400 film review Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 8C Casual Photophile: Film profile, Kodak Portra 400 (James Tocchio, June 12, 2015) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 9C Analog.cafe: Kodak Ektacolor Pro 400 film review (updated June 3, 2026) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 10C Last Good Film Lab: Portra 400 vs UltraMax 400 Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 11C Dehancer: Kodak Portra 400 exposure test Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 12C PetaPixel: Test reveals the exposure limits of Kodak Portra 400 film (Kyle McDougall, February 5, 2018) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 13C 35mmc: CineStill 400D vs Kodak Portra 400 (Ted Ayre, December 21, 2022) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 14C Tony Wodarck: Kodak Portra 400 film guide (June 18, 2023) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 15C Decaf Journal: A review of Kodak Portra 400 film (Nicklaus Walter, July 11, 2025) Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 16C Wikipedia: Kodak Portra Accessed September 29, 2026.
- 17DS Kodak Professional Portra 160, technical data E-4051 (January 2025)
- 18DS Kodak Professional Portra 800, technical data E-4040 (January 2025)
- 19DS Kodak UltraMax 400, technical data E-7023 (February 2016)
DS: datasheet · M: manufacturer · C: review or community