GA — 074 Color negative

FujifilmSuperia 800

Saturated, with lush greens; reviews disagree on the cast (yellow or magenta)

Manufacturer
Fujifilm
ISO
800
Type
Color negative
Process
C-41
Formats
135
Datasheet
AF3-068E

Status checked [2]

After: beach cabin under storm clouds, with the preset inspired by Fujifilm Superia 800 (GA — 074 / P) applied (simulation). Before: the same beach cabin under storm clouds, base development without a preset.
fig. 1 · GA — 074 / P · simulation on a digital RAW, not a film scan Drag, tap or use the arrow keys

Character

Contrast
Medium to firm; the datasheet curve has no shoulder
Grain
Diffuse RMS granularity 5 (Fujifilm's scale); reviews split on how visible it is
Latitude
About ±2 stops (one review); weak in strong, reflective sun
Best for
Low light, flash and compact-camera snapshots (Fujifilm)

Fujifilm Superia 800 is an ISO 800 color negative film for C-41 processing, sold as Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 800 in 135 rolls. Fujifilm aimed it at everyday shooting in low light and with flash, and it carries the four-layer color design of the X-TRA line [1] [2]. It was discontinued in 2016 outside Japan [2]. It is not the same as Venus 800, a related film sold in Japan [7].

Look and color

  • Fujifilm’s claims. The datasheet promises “great vividness” across the spectrum, with brilliant reds, bright blues and clear yellows, plus faithful violets and greens and neutral grays from highlights to shadows [1]. That is a manufacturer’s description, not a measurement.
  • Greens and reds. Reviewers single out the greens: “lush” for Casual Photophile [3], and among the most natural colors, with the reds, for Alex Luyckx [4]. Jim Grey calls the red “wonderful” but finds the colors very saturated [5].
  • The reviews disagree on the cast. Casual Photophile sees a yellow cast and pale skin that looks slightly sunburned [3]. Luyckx, scanning expired film, saw a strong magenta cast, and warns that age exaggerates it [4]. Under artificial light he found an orange cast [4].
  • Shadows. Some community comments on the Superia range mention greenish shadows. We found no review of this film that documents it, so treat it as a weak lead.
  • Light matters. Jim Grey found the color best in diffuse, even light, and “wonky, washed-out” in strong sun on reflective subjects [5] [6]. In a later post he shot it in full sun without trouble, at small apertures [6].

Tonality

  • Curve. On the datasheet’s characteristic curves the three layers run nearly parallel, with a slope of about 0.6 to 0.65 (our reading of the graph). The toe lies between log H −3.5 and −2.5, and there is no visible shoulder up to log H +0.3 [1].
  • Gray card. Fujifilm says an 18% gray card should read a red (Status M) density between 0.70 and 0.90 with recommended lighting and processing [1].
  • Contrast. Luyckx calls it a good medium contrast, neither dull nor excessively vivid [4]. Casual Photophile describes the saturated colors and firm contrast typical of Fuji, sometimes too much [3]. The two descriptions do not match.
  • Latitude. Luyckx quotes about two stops either way [4]. Casual Photophile found it kept a little more detail in underexposed areas than Venus 800 did [3]. Fujifilm itself claims wide latitude, with vibrant colors even from underexposed negatives [1].
  • Long exposures. No correction is needed from 1/4000 to 2 s. Fujifilm gives +2/3 stop at 4 s, +1 1/2 at 16 s and +2 at 64 s [1].

Grain and sharpness

Fujifilm rates grain with a diffuse RMS granularity value, measured with a 48 µm aperture at density 1.0 above minimum density. It is a different scale from Kodak’s Print Grain Index and cannot be compared with it [1].

Film (Fujifilm diffuse RMS granularity) RMS
Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400 4 [8]
Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 800 5 [1]
Fujifilm Superia 1600 7 [9]
  • Reviews split. Casual Photophile finds the grain small enough not to distract [3]. Luyckx calls it pleasing and present [4]. Jim Grey calls it pronounced and disappointing on scans, though it “largely disappears” in prints [6], and his comparison with Venus 800 found the X-TRA grainier and less tolerant of underexposure [7].
  • Sharpness. Fujifilm gives a resolving power of 50 lines/mm at a 1.6:1 chart contrast and 125 lines/mm at 1000:1. It publishes an MTF curve and claims improved sharpness [1].

Spectral sensitivity

The blue-sensitive layer has two humps, near 420 and 465 nm, and falls steeply to about 520 nm. The green layer peaks near 535 nm and the red layer near 630 nm. A dashed, fourth cyan-sensitive layer peaks near 515 nm, well below the green peak [1]. Wikipedia says the fourth layer was meant to improve color under fluorescent light [2]. The datasheet claims accurate color under fluorescent lighting, yet still lists correction filters [1]. The Grain Archive style is tuned from the datasheet and the reviews, not computed from these curves.

fig. 2 · spectral sensitivityFUJIFILM SUPERIA 800 · DATASHEET FUJIFILM AF3-068E
Spectral sensitivity of Fujifilm Superia 800, by layerRelative log sensitivity of the four light-sensitive layers (CN-16, density 1.0 above D-min). Blue has two humps, near 420 and 465 nm (maximum), and falls steeply to about 520 nm; green peaks near 535 nm and red near 630 nm. A dashed fourth, cyan-sensitive layer peaks near 515 nm, about 1.2 log below the green peak. 400450500550600650700 10.50 λ (nm) relative sensitivity
Relative log sensitivity of the four light-sensitive layers (CN-16, density 1.0 above D-min). Blue has two humps, near 420 and 465 nm (maximum), and falls steeply to about 520 nm; green peaks near 535 nm and red near 630 nm. A dashed fourth, cyan-sensitive layer peaks near 515 nm, about 1.2 log below the green peak. Each layer is scaled to its own peak. Color styles are tuned from the datasheet and published reviews, then measured; they are not computed from these curves. Source: datasheet p. 4, traced from the vector graph in the PDF.

Datasheet digest

Fuji Photo Film Co. datasheet AF3-068E, edition 2000-08 (Print code EIGI-00.8; the datasheet carries no explicit date. It covers Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 800 [CZ].). Read the datasheet (PDF) on 125px.com Source: copy hosted by a third party. The Grain Archive does not host datasheets.

Key figures for Fujifilm Superia 800
ItemValueSource
ISO speed800 in daylight; 200 under 3200 K tungsten with an LBB-12 or Wratten 80A filter[1]
Diffuse RMS granularity5 (48 µm aperture, density 1.0 above D-min)[1]
Resolving power50 lines/mm at 1.6:1 chart contrast, 125 lines/mm at 1000:1[1]
Characteristic curveThree nearly parallel lines, slope about 0.6 to 0.65, toe between log H −3.5 and −2.5, no visible shoulder up to log H +0.3 (our reading of the graph)[1]
LayersBlue, green and red layers plus a fourth, cyan-sensitive layer[1]
18% gray cardRed (Status M) density 0.70 to 0.90 with recommended lighting and processing[1]
ReciprocityNo correction from 1/4000 to 2 s; +2/3 stop at 4 s, +1 1/2 at 16 s, +2 at 64 s[1]
Fluorescent lightAccurate color claimed; for unknown lamps, a 30M filter and +1 stop[1]
BaseCellulose triacetate[1]
ProcessC-41 or Fujifilm CN-16 family processes[1]

Names, status and history

  • The name. The datasheet is titled Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 800 and carries the emulsion code [CZ] [1]. Casual Photophile shortens it to Superia 800 [3].
  • Status. Wikipedia records that Fujifilm discontinued it in 2016 outside Japan, with final stock carrying August 2018 expiry dates [2]. Jim Grey wrote his farewell post in February 2020 [6]. Any film sold today is old stock.
  • Venus 800. Fujifilm sold a similar Japan-only film called Venus 800. Wikipedia says the two share the emulsion code CZ, but Jim Grey compared the datasheets and found different tone curves [2] [7]. Casual Photophile likewise concludes they are two different stocks [3]. We found no official statement either way.
  • Contradiction on dates. Wikipedia says Venus 800 ended in December 2019 [2], Casual Photophile in May 2019 [3].
  • Format. The datasheet lists 135 rolls of 24 and 36 exposures with production numbers L01 and above [1].

Alternatives

  • GA — 010 Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400

    Same family and four-layer design, two stops slower: RMS 4 against 5 on Fujifilm's scale

  • GA — 049 Fujifilm Natura 1600

    Faster still and grainier on paper (RMS 7 on the neighboring Superia 1600 datasheet); also discontinued

  • GA — 069 Kodak Max 800

    Kodak's consumer ISO 800 color negative, the closest speed match from another maker

  • GA — 006 Kodak Portra 800

    Professional ISO 800 negative still in production; different grain scale (Print Grain Index), so the figures cannot be compared

Get the look in darktable

The GA — 074 / P preset, inspired by Fujifilm Superia 800, is a darktable 5.6 style of 5 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.

Measured on test RAW files, CIELab
ZoneMetricBefore → after
skyC (chroma)27.5 → 31.4
seaC (chroma)22.2 → 25.7
skinC (chroma)16.4 → 18.5

Settings, all measurements and limits of the Fujifilm Superia 800 preset

GA — 074 / P · darktable preset

Superia 800
for darktable

Full pack · 87 presets · yours to keep
.dtstyle file, darktable 5.6 or later

Try the free pack first · What the full pack contains

See real photos

Scans of real Fujifilm Superia 800 film, published by others:

Questions about Fujifilm Superia 800

Is Fujifilm Superia 800 discontinued?

Yes. Fujifilm discontinued Superia X-TRA 800 in 2016 outside Japan, and Wikipedia notes the last stock carried August 2018 expiry dates. Any roll you find now is old stock and probably expired. The Japan-only Venus 800, a related film, ended in 2019.

Is Venus 800 the same film as Superia X-TRA 800?

Probably not. Some people suspected a rebrand, but Jim Grey compared the two datasheets and found different tone curves, and concluded they are different, though similar, films. Casual Photophile reached the same conclusion from scans. Both films share the emulsion code CZ, per Wikipedia. We found no official Fujifilm statement.

Is Superia X-TRA 800 grainy?

Fujifilm rates it at a diffuse RMS granularity of 5, against 4 for Superia X-TRA 400. Reviewers disagree: one finds the grain small enough not to distract, another calls it pronounced and disappointing on scans, though it largely disappears in prints. Underexposure makes it more visible.

How should I expose Superia X-TRA 800?

Fujifilm rates it ISO 800 in daylight and ISO 200 under 3200 K tungsten with an LBB-12 or 80A filter. One review quotes about two stops of latitude. Jim Grey found the color best in diffuse light and washed out in strong sun on reflective subjects, so shoot it in shade, overcast or evening light.

Sources

  1. 1DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 800 [CZ], product information bulletin AF3-068E (print code EIGI-00.8), copy hosted by 125px
  2. 2C Wikipedia: Fujifilm Superia Accessed September 30, 2026.
  3. 3C Casual Photophile: Battle of the Fujifilm 800s, Venus versus Superia X-Tra (Charlotte Davis, October 27, 2020) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  4. 4C Alex Luyckx: Film review no. 79, Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 800 (January 10, 2022) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  5. 5C Down the Road (Jim Grey): Shooting Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 800 (October 13, 2014) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  6. 6C Down the Road (Jim Grey): Goodbye Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 800 (February 12, 2020) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  7. 7C Down the Road (Jim Grey): Fujifilm Superia X-tra 800 vs. Fujifilm Superia Venus 800 (February 3, 2020) Accessed September 30, 2026.
  8. 8DS Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400, product information bulletin AF3-151E (print code EIGI-03.2), copy hosted by 125px
  9. 9DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 1600 [CU], datasheet AF3-145E

DS: datasheet · C: review or community