FujifilmNatura 1600
Bright reds, oranges and yellows, natural skin; a green cast in the shadows in some reviews
- Manufacturer
- Fujifilm
- ISO
- 1600
- Type
- Color negative
- Process
- C-41
- Formats
- 135
- Status
- Discontinued (2017)
- Datasheet
- AF3-145E
- Preset
- GA — 049 / P
Character
- Contrast
- Drops when underexposed; blacks not as deep as Portra 800 in one comparison
- Grain
- Diffuse RMS granularity 7 (datasheet); reviewers see it mostly in the shadows
- Latitude
- Fujifilm claims a wide one; reviewers say it hates underexposure
- Best for
- Low light, night and indoor scenes, events (Fujifilm)
Fujifilm Natura 1600 is a discontinued ISO 1600 color negative film for 135 cameras, processed in C-41. Fujifilm made it for the Japanese market, and reviews describe it as the same emulsion as Fujicolor Superia 1600, the name it carried in the US [2]. It is remembered as a night and low-light film, and it has the fourth, cyan-sensitive layer of the Fujicolor family [1].
Look and color
- Vibrant, but not extreme. Fujifilm’s bulletin for the sister film promises “vibrant and dynamic reds, blues, and yellows”, violets and greens “with enhanced fidelity”, a well-balanced gray from highlights to shadows, and accurate color under fluorescent light [1]. Reviews are close to that: Analog.cafe reports “impressive colour realism” with minimal casting, and an Emulsive blind test found “lovely bright reds, oranges and yellows” and accurate greens [3] [8].
- Saturation. Analog.cafe places it between Portra and Ektar [3]. A UK retailer describes Natura as having “soft, pastel colours” against Superia’s saturated ones, which is a third opinion on a film that others treat as the same [7].
- Skin tones are natural: Richard Haw says skin is “not magenta like most films tend to” be, and Casual Photophile lists “great natural skin tones” [4] [2].
- The green cast: the sources disagree. Casual Photophile sees “an unmistakable green cast” that shows in the shadows [2]. Analog.cafe finds “minimal colour casting”, with only a light blue cast on inverted negatives that depends on the scan [3]. Exposure probably decides which reviewer is right.
Tonality
- The datasheet sells latitude. The bulletin claims “wide exposure latitude”, with good depth and fidelity even when underexposed in bright surroundings [1]. Its characteristic curves show three nearly parallel layers with no visible shoulder within the plotted range. The slope reads at roughly 0.7 to 0.8 (our reading of the graph) [1].
- The reviews are less generous. Casual Photophile calls it “very unforgiving” when underexposed, with noisy shadows and lower contrast, and says overexposure brings no gain [2]. Analog.cafe puts the usable range at about 6 to 8 stops, with the best results at 6 or fewer, and advises keeping it for scenes of modest contrast [3].
- Underexposure hurts most: highlights turn muddy and sharpness falls [4] [2]. Richard Haw meters about 1/3 stop over, and up to a full stop in bright scenes [4].
- Blacks. In the Emulsive blind test, Natura’s blacks “weren’t as deep” as the reviewer liked, while Portra 800 delivered deep blacks [8].
- Long exposures: no correction from 1/4000 to 2 s; +2/3 stop at 4 s, +1 1/2 at 16 s and +2 at 64 s [1].
Grain and sharpness
Fujifilm gives a diffuse RMS granularity of 7, measured with a 48 µm aperture at density 1.0 above D-min, and claims “highly uniform fine grain, regardless of the film’s ultrahigh speed” [1]. It credits the Nano-structured Σ grain, with crystals about 60% thinner than those of the previous Superia 1600 [1]. Fujifilm’s scale is not Kodak’s Print Grain Index, so compare it only with other Fujifilm bulletins.
| Film (Fujifilm diffuse RMS granularity) | RMS |
|---|---|
| Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400 | 4 [10] |
| Fujicolor Superia 1600 (bulletin used for Natura 1600) | 7 [1] |
- Analog.cafe reports an RMS of 4 for Natura 1600, which contradicts the bulletin’s 7. We could not confirm the lower figure in any Fujifilm document [3].
- Uneven grain. Analog.cafe sees “remarkably fine grain” in the lighter tones and chunkier clumps in the shadows [3]. Casual Photophile says it looks “more like the grain we’re used to seeing in a 400 speed film” [2]. Richard Haw calls it “the best in its class” for ISO 1600, but “don’t expect it to look like a 400” [4].
- In the blind comparison, the grain was “distracting to say the least” in dim light and “quite apparent” in bright light, and the image looked “puffy” next to Portra 800 [8]. Huy Le, who shot it at night, accepts that some viewers will find the grain excessive [9].
- Sharpness. The bulletin lists a resolving power of 50 lines/mm at 1.6:1 chart contrast and 125 lines/mm at 1000:1, and publishes an MTF curve [1].
Spectral sensitivity
The datasheet plots four sensitivity curves: blue, green, red and a dashed fourth layer sensitive to cyan, peaking near 520 nm between the blue and green peaks [1]. Analog.cafe says this fourth layer reduces color casts under mixed light, as in Fujicolor Pro 400H, and Fujifilm claims accurate color under fluorescent lamps [3] [1]. The Grain Archive style does not simulate the fourth layer, which depends on the light of the scene.
Datasheet digest
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISO speed | 1600 in daylight; 400 under 3200 K tungsten with an LBB-12 or Wratten 80A filter | [1] |
| Diffuse RMS granularity | 7 (48 µm aperture, 12× magnification, density 1.0 above D-min) | [1] |
| Resolving power | 50 lines/mm at 1.6:1 chart contrast, 125 lines/mm at 1000:1 | [1] |
| Characteristic curve | Three nearly parallel curves, no visible shoulder within the plotted range; slope about 0.7 to 0.8 (our reading of the graph) | [1] |
| Layers | Blue, green and red layers plus a fourth, cyan-sensitive layer | [1] |
| Grain technology | Nano-structured Σ grain: crystals about 60% thinner than the hexagonal crystals of the previous Superia 1600 | [1] |
| Reciprocity | No correction from 1/4000 to 2 s; +2/3 stop at 4 s, +1 1/2 stops at 16 s, +2 stops at 64 s | [1] |
| Fluorescent light | Accurate color claimed; for unknown lamps, a CC30M filter and +1 stop | [1] |
| Process | C-41 or the Fujifilm CN-16 family | [1] |
| Format | 135, 12, 24 and 36 exposures | [1] |
Names, status and history
- Two names. Casual Photophile writes that the film was “branded as Natura 1600 in the Japanese market and as Superia 1600 stateside” [2]. Fuji X Weekly notes that it found no definitive evidence on whether Natura 1600 is unmodified Superia 1600 or a slightly modified variant [6]. The Grain Archive treats them as one film, because the only bulletin we have is the Superia 1600 one.
- Natura the camera. Richard Haw says the film was first developed for the Natura camera and outlived it [4].
- Dates. Fuji X Weekly gives its production as 2003 to 2017, for the Japanese market [6]. Wikipedia reports that Superia 1600 was phased out internationally in 2016 and that Fujifilm announced the full discontinuation of Natura 1600 in October 2017, with stock lasting in Europe through parallel imports until about mid-2018 [5]. Analog.cafe also dates the end to around 2017 [3].
- Press version. Wikipedia also lists a professional Superia Press 1600 that used the same emulsions and was refrigerated from manufacture [5].
- Now. A UK retailer lists it as discontinued and out of stock [7]. Analog.cafe reports rolls being sold on eBay at premium prices [3].
Also sold as
- Fujicolor Superia Press 1600 (reported) [5]
Alternatives
- GA — 006 Kodak Portra 800
Still in production, one stop slower; in a blind comparison a reviewer found it had deeper blacks, more detail and less distracting grain than Natura 1600
- GA — 012 CineStill 800T
Another film for night work, still in production at ISO 800, but built on a tungsten-balanced Kodak cinema stock (Vision3 500T)
- GA — 010 Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400
The same Superia family with four layers, finer on paper (RMS 4 against 7) and two stops slower; also discontinued, in 2024
- GA — 022 Ilford Delta 3200 Professional
Black and white, if the goal is a fast film for dim light rather than the color: box speed ISO 1000, rated at EI 3200
Get the look in darktable
The GA — 049 / P preset, inspired by Fujifilm Natura 1600, is a darktable 5.6 style of 5 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.
| Zone | Metric | Before → after |
|---|---|---|
| sky | C (chroma) | 27.5 → 28.8 |
| sea | C (chroma) | 22.2 → 21.2 |
| skin | C (chroma) | 16.4 → 19.2 |
Settings, all measurements and limits of the Fujifilm Natura 1600 preset
GA — 049 / P · darktable preset
Natura 1600
for darktable
See real photos
Scans of real Fujifilm Natura 1600 film, published by others:
Questions about Fujifilm Natura 1600
Is Natura 1600 the same as Superia 1600?
Reviews say so: Casual Photophile writes that it was branded Natura 1600 in Japan and Superia 1600 in the US. Fujifilm has published no statement, and a UK retailer describes Natura as softer and finer-grained than Superia. Fuji X Weekly found no definitive evidence either way, so treat the equation as reported, not confirmed.
Is Fujifilm Natura 1600 discontinued?
Yes. Fuji X Weekly gives its production as 2003 to 2017, and Wikipedia reports a full discontinuation announced in October 2017 after Superia 1600 was phased out internationally in 2016. Stock reportedly lasted in Europe into 2018 through parallel imports. Rolls now turn up only on the second-hand market.
Can Natura 1600 be developed in C-41?
Yes. Fujifilm's bulletin for the sister film, Superia 1600, lists C-41 and the Fujifilm CN-16 family of processes, so a standard color lab can process it. It is a 135 film only, in 12, 24 and 36 exposures. Reviewers shot it at its box speed of ISO 1600.
How should you expose Natura 1600?
Reviews agree on a little overexposure. Richard Haw meters at about 1/3 stop over and finds it 'loves to be overexposed a bit' at night; Analog.cafe puts its usable range at about 6 to 8 stops. Underexposure gives muddy highlights, lower contrast and more noise in the shadows.
Is Natura 1600 very grainy?
Fujifilm's bulletin gives a diffuse RMS granularity of 7, and it claims 'highly uniform fine grain' for such a fast film. Reviewers disagree on the result: fine in bright areas, chunkier in the shadows for Analog.cafe, and 'distracting' in dim scenes next to Portra 800 in a blind comparison.
Sources
- 1DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 1600 [CU], product information bulletin AF3-145E (print code EIGI-03.2), sister film of Natura 1600
- 2C Casual Photophile: Fujifilm Superia 1600 / Natura 1600, everything you need to know about this super fast color film (August 21, 2017) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 3C Analog.cafe: Fujifilm Fujicolor Natura 1600 film review Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 4C Richard Haw: Review, Fujifilm Natura 1600 (May 24, 2017) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 5C Wikipedia: Fujifilm Superia Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 6C Fuji X Weekly: Natura 1600 (posts of May 2022) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 7R Parallax Photographic Coop: Fuji Natura 1600 35mm film, 36 exposures (discontinued) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 8C Emulsive: Blind film review #01, Fuji Natura 1600 vs Kodak Portra 800 vs Lomography Color Negative 800 (EM, February 12, 2018) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 9C Emulsive: 5 frames with Fujifilm Natura 1600 at night (Huy Le, July 25, 2019) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 10DS Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, product information bulletin AF3-151E (print code EIGI-03.2), copy hosted by 125px
DS: datasheet · C: review or community · R: retailer