LuckyC200
Saturated reds and greens, subdued blues; the color cast is disputed (magenta, cyan or warm)
- Manufacturer
- China Lucky Film
- ISO
- 200
- Type
- Color negative
- Process
- C-41
- Formats
- 135, 120
- Status
- New (2025)
- Datasheet
- None published
- Preset
- GA — 036 / P
Status checked [1]
Character
- Contrast
- Medium; reviews disagree on how it compares with Kodak
- Grain
- Grainier than Kodak ISO 200 films, finer than Harman Phoenix (Analog.cafe); no figures published
- Latitude
- Narrower than Kodak Gold, one reviewer; similar to ColorPlus 200, another
- Best for
- Daylight and bright light; weaker in cool light and long exposures (reviews)
Lucky C200 is an ISO 200 color negative film for C-41 processing, made by the Chinese manufacturer China Lucky Film and sold in 135 and 120 [1]. It is a new film, announced in 2025 as a comeback for the brand after more than a decade [6]. Early announcements and some reviews call it Lucky Color 200; it appears to be the same film [4] [6]. No manufacturer datasheet has surfaced, so everything below rests on reviews.
Look and color
- Saturated reds and greens, restrained blues. Analog.cafe describes “saturated reds and greens with somewhat subdued blue tones,” and finds blues dull in cool light or when the film is underexposed [2]. A retailer quoted by PetaPixel says the film is “red-based, which makes reds pop in particular” but neutral overall, with average saturation, contrast and grain, like Kodak Gold or “Fuji 200” [1].
- The color cast: the reviews disagree.
- Magenta or pink: 35mmc finds the film “leaning to the coolish side” with “pronounced magenta,” skin included [3]. Analog.cafe reports occasional pink casts [2]. Shellzine cites “saturated magentas and warm colour cast” [4].
- Cyan: Reflx Lab, quoted before the film’s release, called it “somewhat cyanish” [5]. Analog.cafe’s comparison with Kodak Gold also points to a cyan tint depending on the scan [9].
- Warm: Matt Murray sees a red-brown cast in the highlights, which makes portraits harder but can be partly corrected with white balance [7]. The Analogue Shop’s description mentions warm tones and rich greens [8].
- We read this as a film whose cast depends on the scanner, the light and the batch. It is not settled.
- Skin tones are realistic when well exposed, according to Analog.cafe [2], but “a bit off” toward magenta for 35mmc [3].
- Light matters. The film does best with warm subjects in bright sun and in daylight or overcast, and looks dull in cool light [2] [4].
Tonality
- Latitude: another disagreement. Analog.cafe finds it narrower than Kodak Gold and Portra 800, struggling when deep shadows and bright highlights share a scene [2]. Shellzine reports skies turning “a detail-less grey” in long exposures and advises against night work [4]. 35mmc, by contrast, saw no “distinctive difference” from Kodak ColorPlus 200 in latitude or resolution [3].
- Contrast is described as average by a retailer [1] and as lively by another [8]. We found no measured curve.
- Base. The film has an orange mask and dries flat, which helps scanning [2].
Grain and sharpness
No Print Grain Index, RMS granularity or resolving power is published, so there is no grain table to compare.
- Analog.cafe places it between Kodak’s ISO 200 films (finer) and the newer ORWO 200 and Harman Phoenix (coarser), and notes that the blue channel is finer than the green and red [2].
- 35mmc calls the grain fine, comparable to Kodak ColorPlus 200, and found Harman Phoenix II “a lot grainier” [3]. Shellzine reports fine grain with good sharpness [4]. Matt Murray calls the grain structure “very nice” [7].
- Early-batch defects. 35mmc’s first batch had blue and gray dots and banding, blamed on hand coating and expected to be corrected in later runs [3]. We did not check whether later batches are clean.
Specs
| Item | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISO speed | 200 | [1] |
| Process | C-41 | [5] |
| Base | Orange mask; dries flat for scanning | [2] |
| Manufacturer datasheet | None found: no granularity, characteristic curve or spectral data | |
| Formats | 35 mm (135) and 120 | [1] |
| US retail price, June 2026 | $9.99 to $14.99 per roll across four retailers | [1] |
Names, status and history
- A comeback. Shellzine says Lucky made C-41 films from the 1980s, stopped by 2012 and resumed production as film demand recovered [4]. Kosmo Foto reported on February 7, 2025 that a new website announced Lucky Color 200 for the first half of 2025, and added that the site might not officially represent China Lucky Film; Kosmo Foto asked for clarification [6].
- 2025 launch. PetaPixel’s June 2025 first look gave an ISO 200, 35 mm C-41 film with no final name, at about 50 yuan in China, with early supply expected to be limited [5].
- In the US. On June 2, 2026, PetaPixel reported the film on sale from several US retailers in 35 mm and 120, at $9.99 to $14.99 a roll, with Midwest Photo’s wholesale arm distributing it [1]. We did not find a manufacturer product page.
- Names. “Lucky Color 200,” “Lucky C200” and “Luckycolor C200” all appear in sources [1] [4] [6]. No official statement settles the naming.
Also sold as
Alternatives
- GA — 029 Kodak ColorPlus 200
Same speed, and the closest comparison in the 35mmc review: similar grain, latitude and resolution, with better color fidelity
- GA — 008 Kodak Gold 200
The conventional ISO 200 negative reviewers measure Lucky against: Lucky is grainier, with a narrower latitude
- GA — 054 Harman Phoenix II 200
Another new ISO 200 color negative; 35mmc found Phoenix II grainier, with less latitude and worse halation
- GA — 051 Fujifilm Superia 200
A consumer ISO 200 color negative; the retailer describing Lucky's average saturation, contrast and grain puts it in the same lineup as 'Fuji 200'
Get the look in darktable
The GA — 036 / P preset, inspired by Lucky C200, is a darktable 5.6 style of 5 native modules, with no LUT. It sits on top of your own exposure and tone mapping.
| Zone | Metric | Before → after |
|---|---|---|
| sky | C (chroma) | 27.5 → 17.9 |
| sea | C (chroma) | 22.2 → 14.9 |
| skin | C (chroma) | 16.4 → 21.4 |
Settings, all measurements and limits of the Lucky C200 preset
GA — 036 / P · darktable preset
C200
for darktable
See real photos
Scans of real Lucky C200 film, published by others:
- Analog.cafe: Lucky C200 film review, with sample shots analog.cafe
- Matt Loves Cameras: Lucky 200 35mm film review and sample photos mattlovescameras.substack.com
- Analogue Shop: Shot on Lucky C200, customer sample photos analogueshop.com
Questions about Lucky C200
Is Lucky C200 the same as Lucky Color 200?
Apparently yes. Kosmo Foto's February 2025 announcement and a May 2026 review call the film Lucky Color 200, while reviews and retailers from mid-2025 on say C200 or Luckycolor C200. Both are ISO 200 C-41 films. We found no official statement on the naming, so treat the equivalence as reported. [6] [4] [1]
What color cast does Lucky C200 have?
Reviewers disagree. 35mmc found a coolish balance with pronounced magenta and slightly off skin; Shellzine saw saturated magentas and a warm cast; Analog.cafe saw occasional pink casts; a pre-production look at the film called it somewhat cyanish. A retailer calls the overall look neutral. Scanner and light probably matter. [3] [4] [2] [5] [1]
Is Lucky C200 grainy?
Moderately. Analog.cafe found it grainier than Kodak ISO 200 films but smoother than ORWO 200 and Harman Phoenix, with finer grain in the blue channel. Shellzine reports fine grain with good sharpness. No Print Grain Index or RMS granularity is published, so no figure can be given. [2] [4]
Is Lucky C200 in production and where is it sold?
Yes, it is a new film. China Lucky Film's C200 came in 135 and 120, and on June 2, 2026 PetaPixel reported it on sale from several US retailers at $9.99 to $14.99 a roll. It is sold in China at a lower price. We found no manufacturer datasheet or product page. [1] [5]
Sources
- 1C PetaPixel: China Lucky's new color C200 film has arrived in the US (Jeremy Gray, June 2, 2026) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 2C Analog.cafe: Lucky C200 film review Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 3C 35mmc: Lucky C200 vs ColorPlus vs Phoenix II (Chi Zhang, October 9, 2025) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 4C Shellzine: Lucky Color 200, a review of the new Chinese C-41 color negative (XEONIQ, May 2, 2026) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 5C PetaPixel: The first look at China Lucky's new color 35mm film (Jeremy Gray, June 20, 2025) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 6C Kosmo Foto: Lucky Color 200 film announced (Stephen Dowling, February 7, 2025) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 7C Matt Loves Cameras: Lucky 200 35mm film review (Matt Murray, April 8, 2026) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 8R Analogue Shop: Shot on Lucky C200, sample photos Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 9C Analog.cafe: Lucky C200 vs Kodak Gold (free part only) Accessed September 30, 2026.
- 10B The Grain Archive: Lucky C200 style, measurements
C: review or community · R: retailer · B: Grain Archive measurement